True Story of How I Misunderstood The Pure Leverage Compensation Plan.

At first glance, which appears to be more profitable?

1. To earn 100% of what someone pays
2. To earn 50% of what someone earns

For most, A appears to be the best choice, after all 100% is better than 50%.

But let’s break it down and use the, what if scenario, yes I realize “if” can be an infinitive word.  But read along with me.  (A) Let’s say that you sponsor someone and they pay $25 and in return you make $25 that would mean you earn 100% of what they pay. As long as they keep paying, you will earn $25, nothing less and nothing more.

(B) Now let’s say you sponsor someone and they pay $25, but this time you only earn 50% of that $25 meaning you get $12.50, however; you also earn 50% of what that person also earns.  So for example if they earn $500 you will make $250.  As long as they keep paying you will never earn less than $12.50, but there is no cap on what you can earn in 50% matching.

True story:  I misunderstood the 50% matching, and was actually a little disappointed when I saw my earnings for each active member get cut in half the next month, but this is what happened. One of my personal referrals has gone on to sponsor quite a few people and it doesn’t look like he is slowing up anytime soon.

The commissions I’m earning because of the 50% matching have far exceeded what I would have made if I only earned 100% of what that member pays.

If you have not seen the program or the compensation plan, I highly encourage you to at least take a hard look, watch the video all the way through.

Here’s the link to my blog, click on the banner at the top or to the right.http://www.professionalnetworker.org/?t=truestory